Web applications
Authentication, sessions, access control, injection, browser-side behavior, file handling, workflows, and security configuration.
Senam Security · Penetration testing
Human-led testing for applications, APIs, and external attack surfaces—combining repeatable tooling with manual validation of authentication, authorization, business logic, and real attack paths.
Coverage
Authentication, sessions, access control, injection, browser-side behavior, file handling, workflows, and security configuration.
REST, GraphQL, and service endpoints tested for authorization, object access, mass assignment, input handling, rate controls, and data exposure.
Authorized public hosts, services, TLS, identity entry points, exposed administration, and misconfiguration from an outside attacker’s perspective.
Scoped identity, network, storage, and workload testing where the customer and cloud-provider policies explicitly permit it.
Social engineering, destructive techniques, denial-of-service, mobile, wireless, physical, and connected-device testing are excluded unless separately scoped, authorized, and staffed.
Engagement model
Confirm ownership, targets, exclusions, techniques, dates, escalation contacts, stop conditions, and data-handling requirements in writing.
Review architecture and API material, enumerate authorized routes and services, and establish expected roles and trust boundaries.
Combine unauthenticated testing with dedicated standard-user, privileged, and service roles where applicable. Automated breadth supports—not replaces—manual analysis.
Manually confirm findings, contain impact, alert the customer immediately for critical risk, and peer-review evidence before delivery.
Provide engineering-ready guidance, hold a report readout, and verify fixes against the original evidence in an included retest.
What we need
Endpoints are the start. To test how a real user—or a compromised account—could abuse the system, we need approved test identities, role context, and explicit authorization.
Deliverables
Overall posture, business exposure, major attack paths, themes, and prioritized next actions.
Scope, method, severity rationale, affected targets, evidence, reproduction guidance, CWE/CVSS mapping where useful, and remediation.
Findings ordered by practical risk and remediation dependency, with immediate containment separated from durable fixes.
A working session with stakeholders plus one validation cycle that records findings as open, mitigated, or closed.
Common questions
For meaningful application and API coverage, usually yes. We use dedicated test accounts—not employee credentials—and request one account per relevant role. This enables authorization, workflow, tenant-isolation, and privilege-boundary testing that unauthenticated testing cannot perform.
Only with explicit written approval and conservative Rules of Engagement. A production-like staging environment with equivalent identity and integrations is usually safer. If production is required, we agree on test windows, monitoring, rate limits, prohibited actions, backups, and emergency stop contacts.
No point-in-time test can prove the absence of vulnerabilities. The report describes the agreed scope, methods, evidence, limitations, and findings observed during the test window.
Scope a penetration test
Tell us the application type, target environment, number of roles, API surface, desired test window, and business or audit deadline. Keep credentials and sensitive system details out of the first email.
Penetration-testing inquiries
[email protected]